Leadership and Management :: Business and Management Studies

In a firm, management and fly the coopership argon crucial and needed.Leadership and management are similar. Actually, leaders and management are all told contrastive. The leadership would warp thefirm. The leader would have difference leadership styles to lead thesubordinate. The theatre director has different functions, attributes andskills. Different subordinate needs to have different leadershipstyle. Finally, difference powers would have difference use onleadership influence.MANAGEMENT delineateManagement basin be defined as the process of planning organising,directing, and controlling organisational resources in the pursuit oforganisational goals.LEADERSHIP DEFINEDLeadership is frequently defined as a social influence relationshipbetween two or more persons who depend on each other to attain certainmutual goals in a group situation.STYLES OF LEADERSHIPAn tyrantic leadership style is one where the manager setsobjectives, allocates tasks, and insists on obedience. There fore thegroup becomes dependent on him or her. The conclusion of this style is themembers of the group are often dissatisfied with the leader. Thisresults in petite cohesion, the need for high levels of supervision,and poor levels of indigence amongst employees.A democratic leadership style encourages participation in decisionmaking. Democratic leadership styles chamberpot be persuasive orconsultative.Persuasive this is where a leader has already made a decision, buttakes the time to persuade others that it is a fair idea.Consultative this is where a leader consults others about theirviews before making a decision. The decision will take into accountthese views.A laissez-faire grammatical case of leadership style allows employees to carry outactivities freely within commodious limits. The result is a relaxedatmosphere, but one where there are dew guidelines and directions.This stool sometimes result in poor productivity and lack of motivationas employees have little incenti ve to work hard.Autocratic leaders centralize power and decision making in themselves.They structure the consummate(a) work situation for their employees, whoare expected to do what they are told and non think for themselves.The leaders take ample authority and assume full responsibility.Autocratic leadership typically is negative, based on threats andpunishment, but it can appear to be positive, as demonstrated by thebenevolent autocrat who chooses to give some rewards to employees.Consultative leaders approach one or more employees and ask them forinputs prior to making a decision. These leaders may then choose touse or ignore the information and advice received, however. If theinputs are seen as used, employees are likely to bump as though theyhad a positive impact if the inputs are consistently rejected,employees are likely to feel that their time has been wasted.Participative leaders clearly decentralize authority. Participativedecisions are not unilateral, as with the aut ocrat, because they use