Analysis of Dinner Party Essay

The text under analysis is named The D inner Party, written by Nicholas Monsarrat. Monsarrat is a British novelist known for his sea stories and his novels, The Tribe That Lost Its Head and its sequel, Richer Than on the whole His Tribe. The Dinner Party is a piece of narration. It tells us about a voluminous man (uncle Octavian), who was a kind and friendly man, and liked to portray divergeies until January 3, 1925. It was his fifty-fifth birth twenty-four hour period. As usually on such a day he was giving a party, a party for twelve spate. solely of them were centenarian friends. Du shout the party he was admired a kingly diamond ring on the princesss hand. Then the ring was passed from hand to hand, and so it was lost or stolen although all the guests were close friends. Nobody returned the princesss ring back, so it was never demonstrate and it never appe atomic number 18d. Since that sheath Uncle Octavian never gave a single lunch or dinner party for the last thir ty years of his bread and butter.He died a comparatively light man with the particular sadness of a hospitable host. The purpose of the author is to show how its significant to have values, principles and it doesnt make a difference if you be poor or rich. Uncle Octavian believed in his friends and suffered from this at the end as ane person, one of his close friends is appeared to be a thief. Uncle Octavian lost all his friends and was never able to believe anyone from that day. The bilgewater is well-structured, so it may be divided up into the following parts exposition, complication, conflict, climax and denouement. The first part begins with There are still some rich people and ends with until January 3, 1925. It tells us about rich people in their princess world and claims that even those have their problems. In this part we meet with the author, unnamed, and the main character (my uncle Octavian), who is described as a charming, hospitable and most amiable man with th e help of epithets.The second part begins with the haggle Let me tell you a story and ends with all old and sexual friends of my uncle Octavian. This passage describes the authors feelings about staying at such event the 55th birthday of his uncle, and the party itself. Here we observe a commentary of uncles friends and to stress how rich and important the friends of Octavian were the author uses metaphor old flames, and epithets such as respective husbands, exceptional intelligence and his fabulous American wife. The next part begins with Towards the end of a wonderful dinner and finishes with saw her pass it on. Here we becomeacquainted with a princess and her magnificent ring, loved by everyone at the table. The ring itself is described very vividly to stress its importance for example here the author uses an allusion to Genghis Khan. The climax of the story is the moment when everyone understands that the ring is lost or stolen.Here the author describes awed embarrassment of Uncle Octavians cherished friends and uncles belief in beneficial of his close friends. Colorful epithets are used to show growing concern among the guests dreadful, fruitless. In the epilogue we see that the ring was not never found and Octavian died poor man, never throwing a single party again as he lost his trust in people. Monsarrat uses antithesis to express how uncles life has changed since his 55th birthday at the beginning he writes that he was a happy rich man, at the end comparatively poor. Poor here is also a metaphor used not only to describe his financial status, but also to show his inner feelings after that date he lost his trust, his beliefs were deceived. The tone of the story is grammatic and ironical at the same time, as the theme is judging people of being such liars even among friends the theme itself is quite ironical.