Conrads Heart of Darkness and Goldings Lord of the Flies Essay Example for Free

Conrads content of Darkness and Goldings passkey of the travel EssayIn doing this I will explore some of the sev timelize points in both novels. For example they both criticise the period of time they are living in. For Golding it is later on the Second World War and he is addressing that war could break out again. Proving this is in the first chapter we take we was attacked This shows that mankind would attack children in a passenger plane. Whereas Conrad is living in the late Victorian era where Europe has thrust imperialism on Africa and has exploited the natives into slavery. Evidence of this is the chain-gangs.Firstly I am going to go through at how both of the novels in some show a disunite of journey into the human mind. In master copy of the Flies it is where the children cross from the right-hand(a) side of the island to the bad side. This starts with Jack saying Bollocks to the rules This direct showed the breakdown in society. This started possibly not the journey of the children from good to bad, but it is a journey that the island takes from good to bad. It starts with Jack saying that his choir shall be hunters.This begins the journey. The island starts to get darker and the children start to show the darkness of the human heart. With hunters that shtup have qualities linked with it that turns people into mere animals with only one thing on the mindkilling. This is showed by how when Jack, Simon and Ralph light upon the candle buds, Jack acts aggressive with them Jack slashed one of them open with his knife and its scent spilled over them. He didnt just cut them open he slashed them. He again has killing on his mind with we cant eat them. It is not only Jack that has taken this journey into evil. Jacks commonwealth are heard to be chanting incessantly Kill the beast Cut his throat wasteweir his bloodSo Goldings depiction of a journey into the human mind addresses the obsession of killing. Conrad has a sympathetic approach, bu t instead of killing he exercises madness. Evidence that this is a common thing in the congo is when Marlow pays a visit to the bear upon. The Doctor was then with a certain eagerness asked me whether he could measure my conduce Marlow let him, and asked the Doctor whether he measured the peoples heads when they come back too? Now the Doctor says something moderately strange Oh, I never see themthe changes take place inside you know So the Doctor implies that people go mad out there and never come back.The characters in the two novels sort of follow the same lines. I have grouped the main four characters from the two novels and have depute them in to two pairs- Marlow and Ralph and Jack and Mr Kurtz. Firstly, with Marlow and Ralph they start off as good people but they both make geological faults. For Ralph it was ultimately letting the group vote on whether there were ghosts or not. He did not need to let the vote go. What was strange was the focusing in that he asked the q uestion Who thinks that there whitethorn be ghosts? That question seems to lead everyone into saying that there are ghosts. He instantly lost power. He should have asked, Who thinks that there are no ghosts? This would have led everyone into voting for this. Marlow made the main mistake in being led into Kurtzs charisma. He had stated his dislike of the ivory being kept, but when he met Kurtz you hear him say, I was fascinatedJack and Kurtz were similar in that they were evil. I have already examined the way in that Jack is evil, as he instigated the break down in the society on the island. He also had a band of bloodthirsty hunters. Kurtz is evil in the way that he brought in much ivory than all the other stations put together but he never returned it. looking at the viewpoint of the two novels I find that are in two different ship canal to address the nature of the novels. Heart of Darkness has Marlows viewpoint. I believe that this was done so that we could be in line with his thoughts and feelings. This makes us understand more about the darkness of the human heart. Whereas Lord of the Flies has a narrator. We dont get the same inside intelligence as with Marlow, but we get some viewpoints such as Ralph wept for the end of innocenceHaving a narrator helps us to have focused on Ralph on a curve of learning. Simon is viewed differently as his mind is open to us. For example when he encounters the Lord of the Flies, the words that the Lord of the Flies are saying is merely Simon speaking to himself. Golding is writing about Simon in this way so that he can express who the beast actually is. Fancy thinking the Beast was something you could hunt you knew didnt you? Im occasion of you? We instantly now start to understand that something as bad as the Beast has been made up by the human heart.The setting that Conrad uses is firstly the Thames and then he compares it with Congo. He uses the fact that the Thames leads into the biggest, and the greatest, town on earth. Then the journey down the Congo is a road to evil and darkness. The things Marlow see such as the chain gangs. Black shapes crouched, layattitudes of pain, abandonment, and despair They were dying very slowly-it was very clearIn Lord of the Flies Ralph is Adam in Garden of Eden as he has an instinctual relationship with his surroundings, but his goodness bit by bit fades as he is tempted by evil. The apple in the Garden of Eden is the bad side of the island (the beef up area). This is proved by the fact that that was where Piggy was killed his head opened and stuff came out and turned red. some(prenominal) novels address the darkness of the human heart. I believe that they are both very similar. Conrad and Golding both use death as their tool of evil. In Heart of Darkness it is the natives of Africa that are exploited and flogged until they die. In Lord of the Flies Golding has used the fact that even children would murder each other if they were in charge of society. two o f the texts are fables. The two authors criticise what is contingency or what could happen in their period of time. Conrad didnt like what was happening in Africa in the late nineteenth century. Golding was writing what could happen if another war broke out. They may both go to the extremes to condemn society, but with the violence of the everyday world and the overall greed, anything can happen.